Master Thesis

Student: Ali Kazem Bagay

Supervised by:br. Dr . Abbas Ali Ismail

Major: Sharia and Islamic Sciences

Publish Date: 2021

Download File: Click here

Abstract

None of the ancient and modern grammarians differed in that the Holy Qur’an is one of the foundations of martyrdom in language and grammar, but the Basra’s excluded from their approach the invocation of Qur’anic readings unless there is poetry that supports it, or prose words that support it, or an analogy that supports it.
The modern linguists have wondered whether the Holy Qur’an is the first source of the audio grammar, or is it the source that comes in the next rank for the speech of the Arabs, and they differed in that on two groups, a group of researchers argued that the Noble Qur’an is the first source of listening in the formulation of grammar rules. The Arab, and another group of modern scholars argued that the Noble Qur’an was not the first source on which the grammarians relied in setting the rules of the Arabic language, and believes that the grammarians built their rules on the words of the Arabs and then presented them to the Noble Qur’an, or that they relied on the words of the Arabs more than their reliance on The Holy Quran.
Moreover, the grammarians applied their famous theory to these two sources, which were looked at with one eye, which is the reliance on the constant, a lot of mostly speech; They established their bases on the rumors and rumors of what was mentioned in the Noble Qur’an and the words of the Arabs.
It is clear from the above that grammar in the language of the Qur’an is divided into two parts: a part that the grammarians accepted and approved of, just as they agreed on its counterparts from the speech of the Arabs. If they described it as few and rare, or oddities, or weaknesses, or resorted to its interpretation, or carried it out of necessity, or kept silent about it and did not mention it, and this section is what it is correct to call the Qur’anic grammar